!!> KINDLE ➜ Critique of Pure Reason ❤ Author Immanuel Kant – Tactical-player.co.uk

Critique of Pure Reason Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft Riga J F Hartknoch, 1781 , 856 Pp 2nd B Ed 1787 A Edition Ak 4 5 252 B Edition Ak 3 2 552 Critique Of Pure Reason Translated By Norman Kemp Smith Macmillan 1929 Translated By Werner Pluhar Indianapolis Hackett 1996 Translated By Paul Guyer And Allen W Wood In Immanuel Kant, Critique Of Pure Reason, Edited By Paul Guyer And Allen W Wood Cambridge University Press, 1997 In The Current Easter Book Fair There Will Appear A Book Of Mine, Entitled Critique Of Pure Reason This Book Contains The Result Of All The Varied Investigations That Start From The Concepts We Debated Together Under The Heading Mundi Sensibilis And Mundi Intelligibilis Thus Begins Kant S Letter To Marcus Herz From 1 May 1781 Ak 10 266.Kant S Own Copy Of This Book Was Housed At The Staats Und Universit Tsbibliothek K Nigsberg, Before Being Lost In 1945 Fortunately Kant S Marginalia Had Already Been Printed At Ak 23 17 50, As Well As In Erdmann 1881 They Are Also Included In The Guyer Wood Translation.

10 thoughts on “Critique of Pure Reason

  1. says:

    Immanuel Kant is the kind of guy who not only sucks all of the joy out of life he takes great pleasure in opening the spigot of your happiness tank and watching it all spill out onto the burn out lawn and sink into the earth seeping toward the planet s molten, pitiless core and, thereupon, toward its irrevocable dissipation If he wer

  2. says:

    ThesisTurgid, dogmatic, overrated and well past its sell by.ProofAs Einstein exasperatedly said if Kant had only been able to stop pontificating about the nature of time and space, he might actually have discovered something interesting about them Einstein, with considerable justification, felt that he had refuted Kant, and was surprised

  3. says:

    Reason should take on anew the most difficult of all its tasks, namely, that of self knowledge, and to institute a court of justice, by which reason may secure its rightful claims while dismissing all its groundless pretensions, and this not by mere decrees but according to its own eternal and unchangeable laws and this court is none other tha

  4. says:

    When I was about seven, my favorite movie was Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and Mom was dating this philosophy professor who was writing a book on Kant s Critique of Pure Reason One day, I asked him what it was about, and he told me it was just like Chitty It was a kind of magic car that I can still remember his words was able to drive on the roads of se

  5. says:

    I just Kant stand him.Seriously though why does so much Western philosophy remind me of arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin I swear, these gentlemen had their panties wrapped so tightly I don t know how they ever took a proper dump.The problem with Kant aside from how much he enjoyed listening to the sound of his own voice droni

  6. says:

    It is done I have finally scaled the sheer surface of this work It involved continual toil, sweat, and suffering falling down and picking myself up again But, when you reach the end, when your eyes finally hit the bottom of that final paragraph, the feeling is momentous You can stand and look down at the steep drop you managed to climb, and reflect with sati

  7. says:

    Kant s Critique of Pure Reason marks what isor less a beginning of philosophy It is no longer possible to go back behind his Copernican revolution, as if one could do philosophy without taking into account the subject or consciousness This turn toward subjectivity is only tightened with the Wittgensteinian and Heideggarian turns toward language Both naive empiric

  8. says:

    Both frightfully obscure and logically scrupulous, Kant functions sort of like a philosophical litmus test Many a metaphysical charlatan Lacan, i ek, et al has aped his mystifying prose style without any attempt to match his rigour And meanwhile, the most provincial of the analytic camp, unduly equating abstruseness with bullshit, write him off as a mere historical od

  9. says:

    , 840 , , 1781 300 , 840 , , 1781 300 300 , , , , , , , , , , , 840 1781 9

  10. says:

    immanuel kant is by farrrrr the world s most precise philosopher EVER haha. this text, like many philosophical texts out there was really dry. and um. long but there s definitely a reason why this one s regarded as one of the greatest philosophical pieces out there so the book s premise in a nutshell noone can argue FOR or AGAINST an afterlife God he also digs into the idea tha

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *